So here I am, avoiding going to bed as I often do in the hours approaching midnight. As usual, I am surfing the ‘net, this time looking at newsarama.com, a great site that I haven’t visited in a long while. There’s an article ( http://www.newsarama.com/film/091203-academy-awards-oscar-geek.html ) about the widening of the Academy Awards’ Best Picture field from five films to ten, and what that does to the chances of a movie in the SF/Fantasy/Horror genres gaining a nomination….or even a win.
Look at some of the movies that have failed to get a nomination for Best Picture: The Empire Strikes Back. Alien. The Dark Knight. 2001: A Space Odyssey. The original King Kong.
Now, I love all of the above films. (Don’t get me started on the ghettoization of animation. Finding Nemo and Wall*E are arguably 2 of the 10 finest films of the last decade. ) So my rantings here will smack of bias, no doubt. But you cannot tell me that the above movies were unworthy of nomination.
The Dark Knight made more money than any film EVER…except for Titanic. Titanic won Best Picture, and I don’t know anyone who touts it as one of the great films of all time. It was admittedly a spectacular production, a directorial achievement from a visual standpoint that was at that point unparalleled. But it was a saccharine, predictable, and ultimately forgettable story, with a screenplay that failed to get a nomination. Meanwhile, The Dark Knight was the first truly epic superhero film, and I say this with all apologies to Superman, which I adore, but is ultimately too simple a story to be called “epic”. The Dark Knight deals with one massive theme: “What choices would you make on your very worst day?” It uses this theme to define the nature of humanity, to demark heroes from villains from people who just want to do the decent thing and go on with their lives. This theme permeates the arc of every major character in the film, and it is accomplished with such intensity that you remain riveted, almost uncomfortably so, through every moment of the film’s two-and-a-half hours. (Wait, you say. The Joker doesn’t have HIS very worst day! Well, he’s already had it…and it was so bad, he refuses to remember it correctly. He has become everyone else’s worst day.) The effects were spot on. (Who knew the ferries were CGI?) The acting was, with the possible uncharacteristic exception of Christian Bale, superlative. The film will be remembered forever.
So why no nomination? Because it’s a Batman movie, plain and simple. Hollywood thinks it’s too cool to reward cartoons and comic books. There’s also the little matter of politics…gotta nominate Milk, it was made by one of Hollywood’s auteurs, and it’s about a gay guy…which always muddy the waters at the Oscars. (Nothing against Milk, by the way. In the interest of full disclosure, I haven’t seen it, and would very much like to. It just illustrates my point about politics especially well.)
As far as I’m concerned, great story is great story regardless of genre or medium. I have no love for chick flicks. Never cared much for Westerns (why, I have no idea). But Love, Actually and Unforgiven are two of my very favorite films. And I’ll give any film a chance.
This is the same sort of fearful, conservative short-sightedness that caused the rules of the World Fantasy Awards to be changed after Neil Gaiman won for an issue of Sandman. (Gotta give it up to the Pulitzers, who have awarded both Maus and The Adventures of Kavalier and Clay.) And I can’t stand it, because it’s a form of prejudice.
Gah. This gets my goat. I’m off of my soapbox.